Most Used Categories

sports betting AI legislation

Sports Betting And Artificial Intelligence: A.I. Legislation Tracker (2025)

Artificial intelligence (A.I.) can be used by the online sports betting industry to grow revenue (i.e., boost gambler losses). In 2024, the state-sanctioned U.S. sports betting industry took in $13.7 billion from bettors.

There are several ways sportsbooks can use A.I.:

  • Odds creation and risk management
  • Tracking user behavior to maximize their spending
  • Tailored communications to maximize the “lifetime value” of the player
  • Optimized advertising targeted at current or would-be bettors
  • Creation of wagers, including parlays and player props, tailored to a user’s vulnerabilities
Artificial intelligence enables the betting industry to reduce costs and increase revenue. In response, some states have looked at addressing A.I. in the gambling sector.

Growing Concerns Over A.I. in Gambling

Sports betting A.I. technology can contribute to gambling harm. There is no evidence that operators will use A.I. in a way that hurts their bottom line in favor of public health.

Adding to greater concern was a 2025 study on A.I.’s prosperity for risk-taking, which found that chatbots can exhibit problem gambling. In peer-to-peer gambling apps, such as so-called “prediction markets“, bots powered by A.I. could be used to cheat users.

As of late 2025, sports betting addiction statistics show that more than half of online sports bettors have chased losses. Nearly 40% have felt ashamed after betting.

The prevalence of problem gambling among online sports bettors is already high. The further development of A.I. in the industry could worsen a growing addiction crisis.

A.I. Sports Betting Bills in the U.S.

Legislative efforts are underway to restrict the betting industry’s use of A.I.

This page will track state and federal legislation on the topic. Below is an overview:

Jurisdiction Bill No. Focus Status
Federal H.R. 9590 / S.1033 Ban AI tracking, tailored offers, AI-generated bets Pending
Illinois SB 2398 / HB 1565 Ban AI tracking, tailored offers, AI-generated bets Stalled (2025)
New York S5537 / A4279A / A8916 Ban AI-driven tracking, notifications, texts, ads Pending
Oklahoma HB 1537 Ban AI tracking, tailored offers, AI-generated bets Stalled (2025)
Massachusetts N/A Regulatory concern expressed; no bill Potential (2026)
Minnesota N/A Policymaker concern expressed; no bill Potential (2026)

SAFE Bet Act

The SAFE Bet Act, introduced in 2024 by Rep. Paul Tonko (D-NY) and Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), includes explicit restrictions on the use of artificial intelligence in the sports betting business.

Sports betting A.I. is a key focus among federal lawmakers looking to rein in the betting industry.

The SAFE Bet Act would prohibit sportsbooks from using A.I. to track individual bettor behavior, generate personalized promotions, or create A.I.-driven betting products. 

The bill aims to curb predatory practices by banning technologies that manipulate betting habits. It also calls for mandatory gambling safeguards, including customer affordability checks and deposit limits. 

The A.I. restrictions are part of a broader effort to establish federal consumer protections for online and mobile sports wagering platforms.

As of 2025, the SAFE Bet Act was pending in Congress. Its prospects were unclear.

Illinois Sports Betting A.I. Bills

Illinois SB 2398 (2025) would amend the state’s Sports Wagering Act to prohibit sports betting platforms from using artificial intelligence to:

  • Track an individual’s wagering activity
  • Create personalized offers or promotions targeting a specific bettor or group of bettors
  • Develop A.I.-generated betting products, including in-game microbets

Sponsored by Sen. Bill Cunningham and referred to committee in spring 2025, the bill aimed to block A.I.’s role in enabling harmfully tailored or addictive betting products.

The Illinois sports betting A.I. bill bears significant similarities to the SAFE Bet Act.

Illinois SB2398 failed to gain traction in 2025 but will likely be considered again in 2026.

Another Illinois bill to address A.I. in gambling was HB 1565, the Gambling Collection Data Act. Under the proposed law, betting apps or their subsidiaries could not collect data from a user with “the intent to predict how the participant will gamble in a particular gambling or betting scenario.”

New York Sports Betting A.I. Bills

Sponsored by Sen. Kristen Gonzalez and referred to committee in February 2025, Senate Bill S5537 would ban push notifications and text messages from sportsbook apps such as DraftKings and FanDuel.

“With A.I. enhancing the ability of gaming companies to collect data and specifically target consumers, addictions will only get worse as time goes on,” said a bill memo.

“Constant reminders of gambling opportunities through push notifications are one of the key ways betting apps ensure they have a large number of addicted customers and maximize their profit. This irresponsible practice needs to be curbed.”

NY Assembly Member Alex Bores sponsored the Assembly version of the legislation, A4279A.

In mid-July 2025, NY Assembly Member Phil Steck introduced another sports betting A.I. bill. Steck’s Assembly Bill A8916 would prohibit online sportsbooks from relying on artificial intelligence for tracking and advertisement purposes.

States Likely to Consider Betting A.I. Legislation

As of late 2025, only two states have formally considered restricting the betting industry’s use of artificial intelligence. However, more could join the debate in 2026 and beyond.

Minnesota, which hasn’t legalized online sports betting, is a contender to include an A.I. prohibition in a gambling bill that clears the finish line.

Policymakers in the state have shown strong interest in stronger consumer protections for betting.

Massachusetts is another state that could see a future sports betting A.I. bill.

In June 2025, the state’s top regulator expressed concern about sports betting A.I. in the gambling sector.

“If operators are using technology to target bettors, that technology can be used to promote healthy behaviors,” Jordan Maynard, chair of the Massachusetts Gaming Commission, told The Guardian.

“And I believe that a way that happens quicker is for regulators to get involved on the issue.”

Regulator involvement on the artificial intelligence issue could require enabling legislation.

Federal Efforts to Ban A.I. Regulation

Artificial intelligence has its fingerprints all over the U.S. economy. The betting industry’s use of A.I. is only a small part of the broader concern about the technology.
 
In mid-2025, lawmakers on Capitol Hill were considering a 10-year ban on states enacting A.I. regulation. The A.I. industry has long argued that regulation stifles their “innovation,” and such proposals are supported by billionaire gambling investor Peter Thiel.
 
Such a ban would undermine state efforts to address online sports gambling addiction. However, it’s unclear if an A.I.-regulation moratorium would be constitutional.
 
Fortunately, the proposed A.I. regulation ban was stripped from the final version of the so-called “One Big Beautiful Bill” before it was signed into law.

Trump’s December 2025 A.I. Executive Order

On Dec. 12, 2025, President Trump issued a highly controversial EO to block states from passing laws and regulations related to A.I. Critics of the move said it was blatantly unconstitutional. The judicial branch will ultimately decide.

In a statement to GamblingHarm.org, New York State Sen. Gonzalez said the following about her efforts to address A.I. in sports betting and other areas.

“The White House’s latest Executive Order on artificial intelligence is yet another example of corruption from the Trump administration. Regulating artificial intelligence is popular, and an Executive Order to stop it is a move to circumvent the democratic process and give handouts to Trump’s billionaire donors. The introduction of an ‘AI Litigation Task Force’ is a weaponization of the DOJ to benefit Big Tech by allowing them to challenge safeguards on the most critical technological advancement of our time, all at the expense of our safety.

The Executive Order claims to preempt state laws placing common sense regulations on AI usage, but all it actually does is retread the same Trump playbook of threatening to withhold Federal funding, weaponizing the Department of Justice, and hoping this will intimidate state lawmakers from continuing the progress we have made to protect consumers and workers over AI.

As Chair of the New York State Senate Internet and Technology Committee, I have a responsibility to ensure we are able to protect New Yorkers from the potential risks of adopting an untested technology while ensuring a regulatory framework that promotes fair and ethical innovation in the state. I will not be intimidated by the President’s Executive Order or Big Tech’s influence, and my committee will continue to advance legislation regulating AI.”

GamblingHarm.org’s request for comment from sponsors of the A.I. bill in Illinois was declined.

Related: New York Bill Would Restrict A.I. Use In Gambling Therapy


Discover more from GamblingHarm.org

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Discover more from GamblingHarm.org

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading